The Haunted Screen by the film historian Lotte H. Eisner (1896 – 1983) has been an inspiration to me since I read it in the early 1970s. So revered was Eisner by German film director Werner Herzog, that in 1974 on hearing she was dangerously ill, he began to walk from Munich to Paris to see her, convinced that she would stay alive because he was on his way. She recovered, and he wrote a book about the experience, Of Walking in Ice.
Above: Lotte Eisner
The Haunted Screen is an account of the ‘Golden Age’ of German cinema, which began at the conclusion of the First World War, and ended shortly before the coming of sound. (1918 – 1927) German film-makers during this period were influenced by two primary sources: literary Expressionism, and the work being pioneered in the theatre, particularly by the director Max Reinhardt. Eisner demonstrates the connections between German Romanticism and the cinema, through the influence of Expressionist writings.
The following quote from an interview with the film director Paul Leni in the magazine Kinomatograph, is included by Eisner in The Haunted Screen, and has stayed in my mind throughout my working life. Leni is speaking of film design, though for me what he says applies equally to painting.
Paul Leni on set designing
‘If the designer merely imitated photography to construct his sets, the film would remain faceless and impersonal. There has to be the possibility of bringing out an object’s essential attributes so as to give the image style and colour.’
Above: from Leni’s film Waxworks
‘This is particularly necessary for films set wholly in a world of unreality. For my film Waxworks I have tried to create sets so stylised that they evince no idea of reality. My fairground is sketched in with an utter renunciation of detail. All it seeks to engender is an indescribable fluidity of light, moving shapes, shadows, lines and curves. It is not extreme reality that the camera perceives, but the reality of the inner event, which is more profound, effective and moving than what we see through everyday eyes, and I equally believe that the cinema can reproduce this truth, heightened effectively.
I may perhaps cite the example of Caligari and The Golem, in which Hans Poelzig created a town’s image. I cannot stress too strongly how important it is for a designer to shun the world seen every day and to attain its true sinews.
It will be seen that a designer must not construct ‘fine’ sets. He must penetrate the surface of things and reach their heart. He must create mood (Stimmung) even though he has to safeguard his independence with regard to the object seen merely through everyday eyes. It is this which makes him an artist. Otherwise I can see no reason why he should not be replaced with an adroit apprentice carpenter.’
(From Kinematograph, 1924)
At this distance Leni sounds to be a tad bombastic, but at the time I first read his words I was drawn to the visual ‘Expressionism’ he posits. However, even better is Eisner’s description of the Jack the Ripper episode from Leni’s Waxworks. (It’s quite short and comes at the end of the film.) In fact so thrillingly does she write, I’ve always found the sequence itself palls in comparison with her words.
Above: the Jack the Ripper sequence from Paul Leni’s Waxworks. 1924. Multiple exposures create a transparent layering, and the Ripper seems more a phantom than corporeal. That’s him in the centre of the image, his back to the viewer, heading toward the fairground.
‘The most Expressionistic episode in Waxworks is incontestably that of Jack the Ripper, with its sliding corners, its continually shifting surfaces, its walls yielding without revealing what they conceal. It is a chaos of forms: triangles and rhomboids pierce space, sudden cascades of light collide against an infernal darkness. The sequence of all these unconnected objects is completely incoherent, their form offering no point of support. Throughout the turmoil of this setting glides the phantom of Jack the Ripper (Werner Krauss), elusive, insubstantial. Like the surrounding space the ground is without limits, it dissolves underfoot, cracks, congeals, becomes unreal.The big wheel and the merry-go-round become decorative forms for a few moments, casting shadows which resemble birds of prey.’
Lotte Eisner, The Haunted Screen, 1952
It was Eisner’s description of that sequence… rather than the sequence itself… that guided me in 1986 when I worked on the design and the lighting for the ‘Expressionist’ production of Little Shop of Horrors that I directed at Theatr Clwyd.
Above: Eisner-inspired lighting-design sketches for the Little Shop of Horrors set
Below: Expressionism in my 2001 series of drawings titled collectively The Mare’s Tale
And it was the same description that I returned to when I first heard Mark Bowden’s music for The Mare’s Tale, which for me was redolent of the Expressionist imagination Eisner had so evocatively conjured in The Haunted Screen.
Above: Expressionism revisited for the set of The Mare’s Tale
Below: the great Lotte Eisner, who opened a door for me.